Come to the Holy Land in 2013 with the Proctors Click here
Sunday, May 19 2013

email

menuClick Here
Jeffrey M. Bradshaw
Thursday, July 12 2012

The Elect of God: Receive the More Sure Word of Prophecy_ENDNOTES

By Jeffrey M. Bradshaw Notify me when this author publishesComment on Article
Email Author
Author Archive
Send To a Friend
Print Article Bookmark and Share

Endnotes

[1]O. Hyde, Diagram, p. 23. See also D&C 76:56-59. Cf. J. Smith, Jr., Teachings, 27 August 1843, p. 322: “Those holding the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood are kings and priests of the Most High God, holding the keys of power and blessings. In fact, that Priesthood is a perfect law of theocracy, and stands as God to give laws to the people, administering endless lives to the sons and daughters of Adam.” See also J. F. Smith, Jr., Way 1945, p. 208.

[2]G. M. Leonard, Nauvoo, pp. 260-261; J. Smith, Jr., Record, 28 September 1843, p. 416. See also R. K. Esplin, Succession, pp. 314-315; J. Smith, Jr., Words, 27 August 1843, pp. 244-247, 303-307 nn.; W. W. Phelps, cited in S. Brown, Paracletes, pp. 80-81.

[3]J. Smith, Jr., Teachings, 14 May 1843, pp. 298-299.

[4] Elder Bruce R. McConkie writes (B. R. McConkie, NT Commentary, 3:326):

To be called is to be a member of the Church and kingdom of God on earth; it is to be numbered with the saints; it is to accept the Gospel and receive the everlasting covenant; … it is to be on the path leading to eternal life, and to have the hope of eternal glory; it is to have a conditional promise of eternal life; it is to be an inheritor of all the blessings of the Gospel, provided there is continued obedience to the laws and ordinances thereof.

The “calling” of men also includes ordination to the priesthood (see, e.g., D&C 84:33: “For whoso is faithful unto the obtaining these two priesthoods of which I have spoken, and the magnifying their calling…”).

[5] See 2 Peter 1:10; D&C 53:1. In the broadest sense of the word, one can speak of election in an anticipatory context (e.g., the election of Israel) or, alternatively, as the personal assurance from the Holy Ghost that the current course of one’s life is acceptable to God (see, e.g., L. E. Dahl et al., Lectures, 6:2, p. 91). Such preliminary assurance, however, can only be “made sure” through the direct affirmation of the Father Himself.

[6] 2 Peter 1:19; D&C 131:5. See J. Smith, Jr., Teachings, 21 May 1843, pp. 304-306.

[7] D&C 131:5.

[8] Referring to the ancient apostles who witnessed the events of the Transfiguration, the Prophet Joseph Smith taught (J. Smith, Jr., Teachings, 14 May 1843, p. 298):

Though they might hear the voice of God and know that Jesus was the Son of God, this would be no evidence that their election and calling was made sure, that they had part with Christ, and were joint heirs with Him. They then would want that more sure word of prophecy, that they were sealed in the heavens and had the promise of eternal life in the kingdom of God.

On another occasion, Joseph Smith explained (J. Smith, Jr., Words, 21 May 1843, p. 208):

It is one thing to receive knowledge by the voice of God (“This is my beloved Son,” etc.), and another to know that you yourself will be saved. To have a positive promise of your own salvation is making your calling and election sure, i.e., the voice of Jesus saying, “My beloved, thou shalt have eternal life.” Brethren, never cease struggling until you get this evidence. Take heed both before and after obtaining this more sure word of prophecy.

Another account of the discourse gives the following (ibid., 21 May 1843, p. 209):

… how to make our calling and election sure? Answer: It is to obtain a promise from God for myself that I shall have eternal life. That is the more sure word of prophecy. Peter was writing to those of like precious faith with them the Apostles.

Though many individuals in modern times have been personally visited by Jesus Christ or have seen Him in vision, Joseph Fielding Smith, Jr., as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve, did not find it necessary to believe that even all of the apostles had received such a “personal” witness (J. F. Smith, Jr., Doctrines, 3:153-154):

It is questionable if all of the apostles in the former dispensation were “personal” witnesses of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, if by that is meant that he appeared to them after His resurrection. This is certainly true of the original eleven (Luke 24:36-53; Acts 1:1-14; 1 Corinthians 15:5-7). Paul saw in vision (Acts 9:1-9, 22:6-16), but we have evidence that the Council of the Apostles was maintained for some time after the death of some of the original Twelve (Acts 1:15-26; Ephesians 4:11-16; Romans 16:7; 1 Corinthians 12:28-29; Galatians 1:19). Whether these ever had a visitation from the Savior the records to not state.

Every member of the Council of the Twelve Apostles should have, and I feel sure have had, the knowledge of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This does not have to come by direct visitation of the Savior, but it does come from the testimony of the Holy Ghost. Let me call your attention to the statement of the Savior in Matthew 12:31-32. The testimony of the Holy Ghost is the strongest testimony that can be given. It is better than a personal visit. It is for this reason that the Savior said that all manner of sin and blasphemy against the Holy Ghost could not be forgiven.

[9]J. Smith, Jr., Teachings, 27 June 1839, p. 150.

[10] See ibid., 27 June 1839, p. 150. More will be said about this topic below, in the section on the oath and covenant of the priesthood. For extensive discussions of this and related topics, see B. R. McConkie, NT Commentary, 3:325-350; B. R. McConkie, Promised Messiah, pp. 570-595.

[11] Genesis 14:17-24 and JST Genesis 14:25-40.

[12] See Ehat and Cook in J. Smith, Jr., Words, p. 305 n. 29.After emphasizing Abraham’s status as a “friend” of God after demonstrating his willingness to sacrifice Isaac, E. Douglas Clark summarizes scriptures and teachings of Joseph Smith confirming Abraham’s “election sure” which occurred at that time (E. D. Clark, Blessings, pp. 217-218):

[W]hen God announced the blessings; it was not just by promise but by oath, as emphasized by the letter to the Hebrews: “When God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by Himself.… And so, after [Abraham] had patiently endured, he obtained the promise” (Hebrews 6:13, 15). So what did it mean for the Almighty to swear by Himself? God was really saying, according to the Midrash, “Even as I live and endure for ever and to all eternity, so will My oath endure for ever and to all eternity” (citing Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation, 3:160).


0 Comments

Add Comment

520+1000