From the beginning, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has used the King James version (KJV) of the Bible. The KJV is not more accurate than other Bibles, but it was the standard “Authorized Version” for the English-speaking world during the time of Joseph Smith. Consequently, when the Book of Mormon or the Doctrine and Covenants quotes the Bible, it relies on the KJV.

The KJV was prepared by a committee of 47 Bible scholars (most of them clergymen) and published in 1611. Rather than retranslate the text, these men revised an earlier version, the Bishop’s Bible, based on what they considered better readings of some Hebrew and Greek manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments.

Unfortunately, the language of the KJV is archaic and many of the words used therein had a different meaning in 1611 (and even in 1830) than today. Some Latter-day Saints prefer reading a more modern English translation, but Church leaders have declared that the KJV is the official Bible we should use. I agree with this stand, not just because I sustain our leaders, but also because switching to another Bible version would adversely affect our other standard works. The Book of Mormon, the Book of Moses, the Book of Abraham, and some parts of the Doctrine and Covenants have passages that either quote or parallel a biblical passage, making it possible to compare these scriptural passages with the reading of the KJV passage being used. Substituting another version of the Bible would obscure the ties between these scriptures.

kingjames I have long felt that members of the Church would benefit from some instruction on the language of the KJV. I have assembled some of the more important points in my latest (tenth) book, Defining the Word: Understanding the History and Language of the Bible, just released by Covenant Communications. The table of contents illustrates my approach to this topic:

1. History of the English Bible
  Anglo-Saxon Translations
  Early English Versions
  Tyndale’s Bible
  Coverdale’s Bible
  The Bibles of Matthew and Taverner
  The Great Bible
  The Geneva Bible
  The Bishop’s Bible
  The Douai Bible
  The King James Bible

2. King James Language?
 “Scriptural Language”
  An Ancient Practice
  Authorized Version
  Which King James Bible?
  KJV Printer’s Errors

3. Understanding the KJV
  Verbal Forms
  Transliteration of Names

4. KJV Words Whose Meaning Has Changed

5. Spelling Variations

6. Different Renderings of Hebrew Words
  Ambiguity in the English Text

7. Later Misunderstandings of Original Intent
  Hebrew and Greek Words Transliterated in KJV
  Mythological and Unknown Creatures in KJV
  Weights, Measures, and Coinage
  Rendering of Other Misunderstood Words
  Other Problems in Understanding the KJV

Following these is an appendix that includes the preface to the 1611 KJV, written by the translators and addressed to readers, plus a useful index. As we begin a two-year study of the Bible in our gospel doctrine classes (Old Testament in 2006 and New Testament in 2007), I believe this volume will help both teachers and class members to better understand the language of the King James version of the Bible.