Thanks! This article is a big help that I can share with my friends who having doubts that God exist.
RichSeptember 8, 2017
A very good article.
MitziSeptember 7, 2017
Wow, just wow! This complex and timely topic laid out so clearly, even I could follow it. Mahalo for this article, I'm sharing with all my peeps.
Jane NelsonSeptember 6, 2017
I love this article! It was fascinating to note the five distinct atheist philosophies used by Korihor. I also appreciate your clear explanation of how information or intelligence fires the machine and evidences a creator. Please keep writing!
MarcSeptember 6, 2017
Great article. Have never read these subjects laid out as you have done. I have generally believed these things for many, many years viewing God among other things as a master scientist and "ordering" the cosmos applying scientific principles as eternal as He. Thanks for writing this.
DJSeptember 6, 2017
I see footnote reference 1-5 but no footnotes information shown. While I certainly appreciate the argument and highly agree, I would still like to see the reference material quoted.
Comments | Return to Story
L VelardeSeptember 13, 2017
Thanks! This article is a big help that I can share with my friends who having doubts that God exist.
RichSeptember 8, 2017
A very good article.
MitziSeptember 7, 2017
Wow, just wow! This complex and timely topic laid out so clearly, even I could follow it. Mahalo for this article, I'm sharing with all my peeps.
Jane NelsonSeptember 6, 2017
I love this article! It was fascinating to note the five distinct atheist philosophies used by Korihor. I also appreciate your clear explanation of how information or intelligence fires the machine and evidences a creator. Please keep writing!
MarcSeptember 6, 2017
Great article. Have never read these subjects laid out as you have done. I have generally believed these things for many, many years viewing God among other things as a master scientist and "ordering" the cosmos applying scientific principles as eternal as He. Thanks for writing this.
DJSeptember 6, 2017
I see footnote reference 1-5 but no footnotes information shown. While I certainly appreciate the argument and highly agree, I would still like to see the reference material quoted.
ADD A COMMENT