A Rookie Mistake in Forging an Ancient Document
FEATURES
- Has Mocking “Mormons” Become Mainstream? by Maurine Proctor
- Podcast: Three Sons Who Saw Their Fathers in the World of Spirits – Doctrine and Covenants 137-138 by Scot and Maurine Proctor
- Why Latter-day Saint Missions Feel Different Today: A Look at the New Experience by Paul Bishop
- Looking Calm, but Yelling on the Inside by Nicholeen Peck
- You Mormons Are Ignoramuses: Appreciating the Restored Doctrines of Judgment and of Heaven/Hell by H. Craig Petersen
- Visions of Deity in the Kirtland Temple by Karl Ricks Anderson
- A Better Way to Ask “How are you REALLY doing?” by Shalissa Lindsay
- When Moving Might Not Be a Good Idea by Daris Howard
- 10 Ways to Feel Closer to Christ this Christmas by Joni Hilton
- Be of Good Cheer: Finding a Foundation of Steadiness and Courage When Your World Shakes by Paul Bishop
















Comments | Return to Story
Douglas KiesterNovember 10, 2017
My favorite Book of Mormon blunder is Alma 53:6 where Mormon states that captain Moroni "...had obtained possession of the city of Mulek, which was one of the strongest holds of the Lamanites in the land of Nephi." Everyone knows that Mulek is on the east sea coast, and almost due north of the city of Zarahemla, while the land of Nephi is many miles away due south of the city of Zarahemla. What an obvious silly mistake Mormon made. However, the east wilderness which is the land between Zarahemla and Mulek was heavily populated by Lamanites, "where the Nephites had driven them" at the end of the battle with the Amlicites in Alma 2. That land was so full of Lamanites that for a short period this was called "the land of Nephi" . It was a second land of Nephi much like having a Lincoln in Oregon and another Lincoln in Nebraska. This east wilderness "possession of the Lamanites" explains Alma 50:13 and thus places the city of Moroni northward from Zarahemla on the east sea where it must be for many other reasons, and where it belongs.
ADD A COMMENT